More operations
Uptime, SEO and anomaly alerts next to analytics and recordings, so you don't depend on extra tools.
COMPARISON
Anonymetrics vs Overtracking
Analytics and recordings with privacy, extended with operations (uptime, SEO) and AI.
Overtracking offers web analytics and session recordings with a simple, privacy-respecting approach. Anonymetrics plays in the same league and adds cohorts, uptime monitoring, SEO (Search Console), anomaly alerts, AI·Insights and an API with an MCP server for agents.
| Anonymetrics | Overtracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Cookieless by default | ||
| Works without a cookie banner | ||
| Data hosted in the EU | ||
| Full web analytics | ||
| Heatmaps | ||
| Session recordings | ||
| Funnels and cohorts | Partial | |
| Uptime monitoring | ||
| SEO (Google Search Console) | ||
| Anomaly alerts | Limited | |
| AI · Insights | ||
| Public API + MCP for AI | Limited | |
| Script weight | 4.5 KB (gzip) | Light |
| Sites included | Unlimited | — |
| Heatmaps and recordings included | Unlimited heatmaps · 1,000 recordings/month | — |
| Price at 1M events a month | €0 (Founder plan) | — |
Depth of analysis
Retention cohorts, funnels and AI·Insights that explain the changes rather than only showing them.
An ecosystem for AI
A documented public API and an MCP server to connect your data to Claude or ChatGPT.
To be fair: Overtracking is a solid, straightforward choice if you want analytics and recordings without complications. Anonymetrics fits better when you also need the operations and intelligence layer.
Comparison based on publicly available information about Overtracking as of September 2026; their prices are shown excluding VAT. Third-party features and rates change; always check their official site.